CUBITAINER®
vs. bag-in-box

• Fill Cube® with existing equipment. No need for costly filling apparatus as with bag.

• Not just a "cube": Custom shapes, sizes, and value-added features. Unlike "bags" this flexible Insert offers true design versatility and ruggedness!

• Cube® design promotes total emptying. Bag with folds or flimsy construction collapse on self, trapping product inside, reducing value for end-user.

• Use of Cubitainer® permits shipment of Group II or III products with specific gravity over 1.2.

• Cube® is best for environment. Source reduced packaging plus total ease of recycling: Cube® Insert is SPI coded "4" for easy recycling. Bag-in-box with dual/tri-layer design is coded "7" for other materials.

• Cube® seam is formed during molding process for maximum package integrity and security. Bag use secondary seam assembly process.

• Cubitainer® offered in both assembled or non-assembled, in small or large quantities. Ideal for segmented product lines or beta-testing.

CUBITAINER®
vs. pail

• Cubitainer® saves: Lower package, freight, warehousing, and disposal costs with Cubitainer®.

• Cube® Insert: Reduces plastic content by 85% or more!

• Flexible Cube® provides huge advantage in shipping, storage fees, and space consumption over rigid pail.

• End-user waste hauling fees drastically reduced with switch to Cube®.

• Cubitainer® design offers up to five panels for marketing/usage requirements versus two for pail.

• More finished product on pallet plus elimination of "lid popping" worries as with pail.

• Custom design capabilities at a fraction of the cost of rigid options.